Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Digital ANC solutions: Where does an analog system fall behind?
A weak point of an analog system simply a complicated development process, which is generally related to the ANC filter development. This at times time-taking strategy must be practiced for each headset as an element of the headset development process. It's important to express that the acoustical depiction is always a bit of the development and change regardless of an analog or digital solution is used. Regardless, of the extent of the filter structure, there are huge complexities between the two solutions.

[Image: developing-programmer-development-websit...7-1162.jpg]

For an analog ANC system, the ANC filters rely upon discrete parts like resistors and capacitors, and adapting these analog filters requires experience in analog filter structure. In particular, hardware design engineers face a typical issue when working up the PCB of a headset: the ANC filter is still being worked on and the necessary footprint for the ANC filters is not completed now.

Often spare part footprints, without knowing the particular size of the part, should be set, which likely won't be used in the end product. This is another noteworthy partition factor for a digital system that can provide a standardized footprint to a hardware design engineer. There's no convincing reason to consider external channel fragments anymore since the filters are a part of the firmware that can be updated anytime during the development method. In a digital system, the performance of the ANC filter move function is direct and a simple UI can help with arranging the ANC filter.

Changing the filter, to see the effect on the ANC performance, should be feasible in real-time, and including extra features is as simple as a mouse-click. The opportunity of firmware updates once the headphone is accessible, to incorporate or improve existing features, for instance, alternative ANC operation modes or particular music EQs, is a strong argument for the end-user to buy a digital-based ANC solution.

Despite the upsides of a digital system during the development process, such a system takes over more noteworthy flexibility and improved yield rates during huge production. Since an analog system has fixed parts for the ANC filter as well as for music playback, you can't change anything during the huge production cutting strategy except for the gain level of the ANC microphones.

Since an ANC system is to some degree sensitive on resilience on electrical as well as electromechanical portions, a digital system would consider an algorithm to compensate for frequency response resistances in the music signal playback path. Instead of replacing a speaker with an insufficient frequency response, a DSP could compensate for the lack of performance.

The same strategy is also practical for the ANC signal path. A digital system would consider real-time ANC filter adjustments to fulfill the performance necessities to also improve production yield and decrease in unit cost.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)